Friday, April 6, 2007

HR Issues in the IT Industry

The IT industry came into India with a mighty bang. IT becomes extremely relevant for HR professionals simply because the main knowledge “resource” of the IT industry is “human”. The initial big bang saw a large number of engineers moving into the IT industry. But now, the scenario has changed.
What used to be a top-notch career option for smart engineers has now become a backup plan. When I had passed out of college, IT jobs were a dream come true. People held it up proudly. Except for a few, this path was the future ahead for many. But when I went to my college a couple of days back, my juniors informed me that now IT jobs were a backup for almost all the students. Nearly all the final year students are either writing exams for higher studies or looking for technical jobs. What happened to the ‘dream companies’ that charmed youngsters? That made the youth of India proud to be associated with them? Let’s look into some of the characteristics of the IT industry and how things have changed with time.
Almost all the work in IT companies in India can be broadly divided into two sections: one involves developing new software technology depending on requirements of clients and the second deals with maintaining already existing software. To elaborate, the first form of work is extremely interesting: The client gives you certain requirements and demands and you have to develop new software for the client. The second type is a little less fascinating. Here, you work with already existing clients. If there are issues or problems with the software provided to the client, you work on them and solve them. As can be guessed, most of the work in IT companies is of the second type. Most of the software requirements of clients are related to maintenance.
And the problem arises here. Working in maintenance does not require too much of creativity. You are given a huge chunk of code, which you need to look through, debug and make necessary changes to. For a youngster, who is at the beginning of a ‘colorful career ahead’ as the advertisements offered, how attractive is this?
Perhaps, in a different market scenario, people would have been ready to work on these types of projects. But the opening up of the market and the large number of job opportunities change the equation altogether. An organization cannot retain an employee with false promises anymore. There are too many companies in the market, ready to pounce on that young man, who even shows the slightest interest in moving out of his job.
Also, the greater business opportunities have increased the demand for software engineers in the country. In the Indian ITES sector, as many as 200 personnel are hired every working day of the year. As per Nasscom’s annual market intelligence study—Strategic Review 2003, there would be a requirement of 1.1 million professionals in the ITES-BPO segment by the year 2008. There are a large number of projects which involve big-time money that need to be manned accordingly. Talent is in high demand, and organizations are running wild to get numbers.
The altered market scenario has not only brought in the kind of change mentioned above; it has also increased the ambitions of young minds. We know we are in demand; we know we have opportunities wherever we go. We can take risks; in the end, even if nothing else works, one just needs to float his CV on one of those websites and tada! there are hundreds of jobs waiting.
A news piece that I was reading a few days back states that the scenario has changed from just hiring anyone and everyone (due to shortage of manpower) and that the requirement presently is for professionals with more domain-specific skill sets and business analysts with programming skills. This trend clearly reflects that Indian ITES companies are tapping high-value service segments. Therefore, HR targets people with experience, in order to reduce training expenses and time spent on developmental activities.
At this juncture, I would like to mention some observations that I made while I was working with Infosys. Infosys recruits not only engineers, but people with basic degrees such as Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) and Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) as well. They then put them on projects that do not need technical expertise, for example, testing and service centers. After working with the company for a couple of years, by when they get a hang of things, they are provided with intense training and promoted to the cadre of software engineers, equivalent to a fresh entrant from an engineering college. The point that I would like to make here is that the big companies like Infosys are now looking beyond engineers. There are several advantages to this approach:
(a) More graduates are being given good job opportunities.
(b) Since the basic work is being done by other graduates, engineers can be given more attractive work and therefore, keeping them interested becomes easier.
(c) Graduates demand lesser salaries than professional engineers.
(d) As I mentioned earlier, the larger percentage of projects are maintenance projects which do not require great skill sets. By employing trained graduates to do this work, you can imagine the profits that can be generated, since they demand lesser salaries as well.
(e) Companies like Infosys can now target maintenance projects largely. The advantage is that this ensures larger number of projects and larger profits as well. It also ensures that the company can spread its grasp over a larger number of clients across various sectors and geographies.
But there is one problem that the industry still faces. This is the problem of training. There are a large number of issues related to training. Well, I myself am a perfect example to prove my point. I joined Infosys in a batch of 1000 odd fresh engineers from colleges across India. We were divided into 5 classes and were initially provided generic training. After a month or so of this generic training, we were given specializations randomly. We then studied these specializations and within a couple of months or so, were done with our training.
Before I go on, it would be wrong on my part not to mention some things. Infosys provides amazing training classes and facilities. The faculty is talented, the facilities provided are impeccable and the material is above par. All in all, the 1st impression that you have is: WOW! They are putting in a lot of efforts to make sure that we feel at home. But unfortunately, in most cases, these efforts bear no fruit.
First of all, training calls for heavy expenses. But people like me, who have no intentions of staying in the company for long, utilize these training facilities and then quit. For a company like Infosys, this is something they can bear with. But a more important fact is that smaller IT companies are taking advantage of the high quality training provided by the biggies. The model of companies like Infosys is high quality training, lower salaries. (This model is the only way companies can face attrition. They can’t fight attrition, so they work on a model that will cause them least harm.) The model of smaller IT companies is no training, higher salaries. So, a number of people after the high quality training and some experience move out to smaller companies which offer them better salaries.
A grave mistake that the HR in Infosys made is that trainees were given specializations randomly. They were given no preferences. This demotivates a large number of engineers who may have specific interests and perhaps even some form of previous training in certain specializations. What’s even worse is that after a few months’ of grueling training in a particular specialization, people are mostly put into projects on platforms other than those they are specialized in. People get frustrated at this point as all the training obtained so far has gone to waste and more training has to be undergone.
All these issues point to one fact: the role of HR in the IT industry cannot be ignored. The solution to a number of problems that are faced by the IT industry may lie in the hands of the HR of these companies. Let’s look into how HR can help:
1. Recruitment: The ability to identify the right talent is crucial. This is a basic feature of good recruitment. But now, attention may be shifted from fresh engineers to other graduates with basic aptitude and attitude.
2. Training: Employees’ preference may be considered before providing them specializations. As much as I do agree that business requirements are important, this is a good way to ensure that employees feel that their needs are being catered to.
3. Employee Development and Performance Management: It’s not only about identifying talent, it’s also about providing the right platforms for growth. Skilled youngsters know that they are in demand. They must be provided with what they want, at some point of time or the other. False promises don’t work anymore.
In the future, HR managers have to continuously evolve career paths, motivate their employees and create a culture of oneness, which will also act as retention tools. A lot lies in the efficiency of HR tools in an organization. This fact, if ignored, can cause the downfall of the organization even before it realizes it.

4 comments:

alpha_ro_mel said...

Well...
First things first. Congratulations 4 starting such an excellently articulated blog. The issues touched upon are relevant..both from professional and personal frontiers ( I have heard you air these views at least a couple of times before!)

"Right Said Fred.." is the phrase i must use over your post, in complete agreement over the listed phenomenons. However a couple of skepticisms remain over the subtler causes behind..
1. Do you really feel that Infosys HR is that unaware of the events that you could so casually observe. I say this because, Narayan Murthy personally stated in magazines that enriching India's Human Capability Index is a top priority for him (even at a slight cost of Infosys) as a mission..Can't it be that philosophy is extended via these programs.
2. Much more plausible is the explanation that despite the turnover, the retention rate and the productivity returns are so much that they can absorb the hit rate.
3. Allocating people according to their preference is a well said principle, but i do not know how far its practical. When joining most kids don't even know what they like (leave liking they haven't even heard of the Technologies). Take my example as a typical case..I was put into a technology called Siebel, one of the hottest in the market. Initially i had no clue where i was headed for but later on i found the platform engaging.
The fact that i had never heard of
it didn't prevent me from liking the work that later came my way. However it could have been the other way round too. So it indeed happened for many of my friends who ended up in areas they did not feel particularly enthusiastic about. The point i am trying to convey is that, before joining none of us knew what was good or bad. We had the haziest of ideas about technology. Our luck was random.

Now let's take out the randomness. What will happen say we give preference for particular domains. Remember we have only the haziest of ideas, that have strong connotations of "lucrative" or not. Like anything related to Java was perceived "Hot" in my batch, mainframe was generally looked down upon and came with a "Not worth it" image, a view partially if not completely false. So if CTS tried to allocate us training according to our interests what would have happened? All of us would have flocked for Java and Mainframe would be left threadbare, a situation obviously any company can't permit. So do you see the problem of trying to accommodate people in accordance to their preference? Its analogous to everyone rushing for Computer Engg. after post -XII CET exams. From a larger perspective you can say this is the problem of an imperfectly informed market, where people don't make rational choices after all..something Dr. Stiglitz harped on.

Given this scenario do Human Resource executives have any other option. Let's think about it!!!

Renjini Joseph said...

Hey alpha_ro_mel,
Thanks for the comments.. Well, I do agree that Infosys HR may be aware of these events... These were just observations on my side.. in fact, my intention was to say that a similar model may be adopted by HR of other IT companies as well..
The remaining points are also well taken.. any business decision has to ensure financial returns..
I still tend to disagree with the fact that allocating people based on preference is difficult.. they could atleast ask if these freshers have some form of previous exposure to any software and whether they would like to pursue it further.. Its just a matter of one more column or row in the form.. In fact, if I remember well, the column is already there.. they just need to pay attention..
Actually, the problem is the huge numbers.. they can't give attention to individual likings.. but these are the issues that HR needs to look into.. we are here after all for both sides, na??

M14AG3 said...

I was supposed to put a comment long time back, but then the laziness in me held me back from doin it....so here goes the comments from a person who got to see a very different IT industry from what he had thought of it (IT) when in college......so as a college student, and from what i could infer from the media, I perceived indian IT industry as one which did quality world class software development, an industry dealing with the latest in technology, a professionally managed industry, an industry which practised fair practises in its operations....in a nutshell i saw it as a very employee friendly industry where employees were give fair opportunities, and good environment for building up a career.......so when the companies came for campus placements I perceived the big promises they gave in their presentations to be true.

Before I go into what I got to see in the company let me give an accoount of how they presented themselves in campus.....they calimed to be the leaders in telecom software developemnt, clamied they did cutting edge development in telecom doamin, claimed they were active members in telecom standards bodies, and etc etc......so the feel everyone got was that of a good technical company which worked in a very exciting telecom software development field.......

Now what I got to see inside.....yes all what they claime d in their presentation was true.....they indeed did all those exciting stuff....but tht amounted to just maybe 10% of the work they undertook......the majority work they undertook was outsourced work from other major global telecom companies...work those companies felt more of as boring , clerical, and monotonous.......a mojor chunk of it is testing and validation....... and it was for these kind of works that we freshers were taken in, because experienced people seldom choose such work, secondly as freshers we dont have any other choice but to take it.

I am not against Indian companies doin these kinda work, its business and it brings in vital wealth into the country and gives employment, what I dont agree to is the false promises that they give while offering the jobs......I would have never complained had they told us at the time of campus placement that we might be put into these kind of works....and thats where the HR dept come into action.

As far as HR people are concerned they have these targets of getting this many new joinees and for that they prepare these fantastic presentations and show them off to the college students and when these college students come into the organisation with so much expectations, all what they get is "organisational goals come ahead of individual employee goals"!!!!!!

And I think the issue of attrition is directly linked to this problem....as soon as a person gets this kinda treatment at the hands of the company, he will no longer have any feeling for the organisation......from then on organisation is nothing but a place to get ur monthly salary.....or u can say we tend to lose the soul of the company......He hasnt got a work he enjoys then the only thing he is concerned is the salary involved, and hence we see people hoping job after job for bigger and bigger salaries

No matter what kinda crap HR stunts u try to do ( team outings, team picnic, fun programs, bonuses) u wont be able to gain that respect for the organisation. I was kinda stunned by the kinda money they spend in these PR stunts, but they hardly matter.

I was also fortunate enough to work in a small startup that my big company had acquired, and fortunately b4 they were fully integrated into our system.......they didnt have these fancy HR programes, they worked in a small building, without even round the clock tea/coffee,no brightly lit office space, no fancy IP phones,no cab facility, if u were to give star ratings to the facilities in the two companies it would be 5 for my big and maybe 2 for this small company.... but yet they did very good work, but more than that the kinda relation the people had with each other was different, they were proud to be a part of the organisation and the work they did, they were "Happy" doin their work, eventought hey had to do much more work than normal......

And i would say there was hardly any attrition in that company......bur no sooner did they join us than the attrition started rocketing :)........

What I could feel in the software industry is this obsession with ones career growth......everyone feels for oneself, how one can maximise one's chances of getting better reviews, even if it is at the expense of a fellow employee......at this juncture i am reminded of the scene in the movie Beautiful Mind where Nash gets his breakthorugh original idea , and when he says that the best outcomes not when everyone tries to get whats best for him, but when everyone tries to get wats best for him and the group he belongs to.....thats the kinda feeling employees in indian IT industry need to get, and for that whats important is, it need to be made sure that their faith in the organisation is not lost....and that what HR and recruiters have to aim for.

NOTE: I have just put in the thoughts as they came to me, there is no structure or articualtion, but I think the essence is there. Pardon the kinda advisory stance towards the end :)

Renjini Joseph said...

Thanks noni.. for the wonderful insight that you have given to the topic.. I must say that it makes a lot of sense when it comes from the horse's mouth.. i completely agree to your point that the HR are concentrating on things that hardly matter.. and sometimes, i believe, this is where HR outsourcing comes into the picture big time. These events like fun n stuff need to be outsourced and the serious issues like motivation, employee engagement and employee satisfaction need to be looked into more seriously. Being on the side of HR now, we are loaded with so much of clerical work that at the end of the day, we don't have the time, energy and capacity to work towards more substantial matters. I totally relate with what you say, noni.. Let's hope that the batches that pass out these days have the sensitivity to understand what the core issues in IT sector are and work towards it.. and not fall for the everyday administrative work that is currently being done by the HR department.. Once again, thanks for some wonderful insight..